0PurposePurpose

The Interest Media Era: Why Brands need to rethink social content

  • Social platforms increasingly organise attention around what people care about, rather than simply who they follow. For brands, that changes what deserves to be posted

For years, the logic of social media was relatively straightforward. Build an audience, grow your followers and communicate with them consistently.

That approach made sense when platforms were largely organised around the social graph. People followed friends, creators, companies and publications, and much of what appeared in their feeds came from those connections.

That model has changed.

Open TikTok, Instagram or YouTube today and a significant part of what you see may come from people and organisations you have never followed. Recommendation systems increasingly decide what to show based on what you watch, search for, engage with and appear interested in.

TikTok's For You feed has been built around this principle from the outset, adapting recommendations according to users' interests and behaviour. Instagram recommends content from accounts people do not follow across parts of the platform, while YouTube says its recommendation system looks at signals including viewing and search history, subscriptions, engagement and users' inferred interests. (TikTok Newsroom)

Social media is becoming increasingly interest-driven.

For communicators, that distinction matters.

Your followers are not your guaranteed audience

Many organisations still approach social media as though they are publishing to a database of people waiting to receive their updates.

A company has 20,000 followers, so 20,000 people are considered its audience. It posts a new appointment, an event photograph, an award or a corporate announcement and assumes its community will see it.

In reality, following an account is only one of many signals that influence what appears in someone's feed. Every corporate post competes with creators, publishers, friends, news, entertainment, and countless other pieces of content that a platform believes could interest that person.

At the same time, brands now have greater opportunities to reach people who have never followed them.

Instagram has introduced features specifically designed to test Reels with non-followers, while YouTube describes its recommendation system as a way to help viewers discover new topics and creators alongside the ones they already know. 

This changes how we should think about follower numbers. Building a relevant community still matters, but follower count alone tells us increasingly little about who will actually pay attention to the next post.

The more useful question is: who is actually choosing to consume the content?

Every post has to earn attention

This creates a harder test for corporate communications.

Why would somebody who does not work for your organisation, buy from it or already know it stop scrolling for this particular post?

It is worth asking because much corporate content struggles to provide an answer.

  • “Proud to announce...”
  • “We are delighted to share...”
  • “Another successful event...”
  • “We are pleased to welcome...”

There is nothing inherently wrong with these posts. Appointments matter. Awards can strengthen reputation. Events demonstrate activity. Company milestones deserve recognition.

The problem comes when organisations assume that information which matters to the company will automatically matter to everybody else.

It won't.

Interest-driven distribution makes that distinction increasingly important.

A post that only makes sense to people already familiar with the organisation will probably have a limited audience. A post that explains something useful, answers a genuine question, offers a credible perspective or contributes intelligently to an existing conversation has the potential to travel much further.

The organisation still gets visibility. It simply earns it differently.

Start with the audience, not the content calendar

This also changes how communications teams should plan content.

Many calendars begin almost entirely from inside the organisation.

What are we announcing this month? Which event are we attending? What service should we promote? Which international day could we mark? Which member of the team should we feature?

These questions have a place. They should not define the whole strategy.

A stronger content plan also looks outward.

What is our audience trying to understand? What is changing in their industry? Which questions are clients repeatedly asking? Where does our organisation have credible expertise? What can our people explain particularly well? Which conversations can we contribute to with genuine authority?

This is where expertise can become powerful social content.

A lawyer explaining what a regulatory change actually means for businesses gives people interested in that issue a reason to pay attention. A payments executive examining why consumers abandon online transactions can reach an audience interested in e-commerce. A sustainability specialist challenging a widely held assumption can create a conversation beyond the company's existing community.

The brand remains visible, but the starting point changes.

Instead of asking “What do we want to say?”, organisations need to ask “Why should our audience care?”

That small change can completely alter the quality of a content strategy.

Corporate content still has a job to do

None of this means every brand should behave like a creator or judge every post by its potential to go viral.

Organisations have communications objectives that extend far beyond reach and engagement. Reputation, stakeholder relationships, recruitment, employer branding, corporate positioning and trust all require different types of communication.

Some content needs to inform existing stakeholders. Some needs to record an important corporate development. Some needs to reinforce expertise. Other content should help the organisation reach people who may never have encountered it before.

A post seen by 500 highly relevant decision-makers may deliver far greater value than one viewed by 100,000 people who have little connection to the organisation or its objectives.

The answer is therefore not to chase reach.

It is to know what each piece of content is supposed to achieve, and to measure it accordingly.

Stop creating content for the algorithm

There is another trap in the shift towards recommendation-led platforms: becoming obsessed with the algorithm itself.

Every change generates another round of advice about ideal formats, posting times, hooks, hashtags, video lengths and supposed algorithmic preferences. Some of these considerations can be useful, but they are tactics rather than strategy.

YouTube's own guidance makes the principle unusually clear. Creators should focus on whether audiences like their content rather than asking whether “the algorithm” likes it. Its systems then learn from how viewers respond through signals such as whether they choose to watch, how long they stay and whether they appear satisfied. 

That is useful advice for brands too.

Platforms will continue to change. Formats will evolve. Recommendation systems will become increasingly sophisticated.

The more durable strategic question is whether you understand what the people you want to reach genuinely find relevant.

Before you publish, ask one harder question

The shift towards interest-driven media raises the standard for corporate content.

Brands still need consistency. They still need a clear identity. They still need to communicate achievements, people, services and positions. And building a community of followers remains valuable.

What has changed is the assumption that access to an audience automatically means access to its attention.

Before publishing the next post, communications teams should therefore ask: If someone knew nothing about our organisation, would there still be a reason for them to stop and pay attention?

You will not need the answer to be yes every time. Some communications serve a specific corporate purpose.

But if the answer is repeatedly no, the issue may not be the algorithm. It may be the content strategy.

At Purpose Communications, we help organisations develop communications and social content strategies built around clear business objectives, relevant audiences and ideas worth paying attention to. If your social channels have become a calendar of things to post rather than a strategic communications tool, it may be time to rethink what earns a place in the feed.

Progress is our Purpose. 

Share