By Rena Tsangari, PR & Events Manager
Watching this year’s World Cup through the lens of a communications professional, one shift became increasingly clear. Major sporting events are no longer shaped only by the organisations that own the official rights. They are also shaped by the brands that understand how to participate meaningfully in the cultural moment surrounding them.
Official rights remain a powerful advantage, but rights alone do not create relevance. Sponsors must activate them through a connected communications strategy, while brands outside the official sponsorship framework can still earn attention by contributing something timely, distinctive and credible.
Sponsorship may give a brand visibility. PR is what gives that visibility meaning.
When covered logos became more visible
FIFA’s clean stadium policy required venues carrying the names of companies that were not official tournament sponsors to be temporarily renamed and their existing branding covered.
Levi’s Stadium, for example, became San Francisco Bay Area Stadium during the tournament. Yet covering the familiar red Levi’s sign with white material made its distinctive batwing shape even more noticeable. The brand extended the idea across its social channels and stores, turning a compliance requirement into recognisable content. One Instagram video connected to the activation attracted two and a half million likes.
Gillette responded with equal confidence. At the temporarily renamed Boston Stadium, its signage appeared to be concealed beneath an enormous layer of shaving foam, accompanied by the message: “At least we got to choose how we cover it.”
In both cases, the absence of the name became the story. The result was earned visibility generated through brand recognition rather than conventional logo exposure.
These brands could respond so effectively because years of consistent brand building had created assets audiences recognised without seeing a wordmark. A distinctive shape, product association or tone of voice can maintain recognition even when conventional visibility disappears.
For communications professionals, the lesson is clear: brand identity should never depend on the logo alone. The strongest brands build a complete visual and verbal language that remains recognisable in unfamiliar or highly controlled environments.
Cultural participation does not always require official rights
Norwegian and British Airways demonstrated a different route into the World Cup conversation ahead of the quarter-final between England and Norway.
Norwegian challenged British Airways to a friendly wager: the airline representing the losing country would replace its Instagram profile picture with the winner’s logo for 24 hours. When England won 2–1, Norwegian honoured the agreement and temporarily adopted the British Airways identity. The exchange attracted international coverage and positive engagement for both airlines.
The concept required no tournament rights, stadium presence or complex production. Its impact came from timing, relevance and the willingness of two competitors to create one shared story. Both found a credible connection between their national identities and a match audience was already discussing.
The activation also shows that real-time communications require more than speed. Brands need a clear personality, internal trust and the confidence to accept an outcome they cannot fully control. When these elements are in place, a simple interaction can earn attention by becoming part of the audience’s experience rather than interrupting it.
Experience is measured beyond attendance
The World Cup generated experiences at different scales, from fan zones and public screenings to retail spaces and invitation-only events.
Visa’s “Dinner on the Pitch”, presented with Chase Sapphire Reserve, demonstrated the communications value of exclusivity. At San Francisco Bay Area Stadium, fewer than 200 guests dined directly on the football field. The experience included a menu by Michelin-starred chef Richard Lee, appearances by Rio Ferdinand and Juno Temple, and live performances.
Its impact came from contrast. A venue designed for tens of thousands of spectators became the setting for an intimate dinner in a space audiences would rarely access.
The guest list alone, however, did not define the result. The location, personalities and production generated material for media coverage, photography and social content, allowing the experience to reach far beyond those present.
This reflects a broader change in event communications. Experiences must be designed for two audiences from the beginning: the people in the room and those who will encounter the event through a screen. Communications professionals must identify the moments capable of carrying an experience beyond the venue and build them intentionally into its design.
Sponsorship rights are the starting point
The attention earned by non-sponsors does not reduce the value of official sponsorship. It clarifies what sponsors must do to justify that investment.
Official partners have privileged access to tournament assets, audiences and environments. Their challenge is to connect those rights across multiple touchpoints rather than relying on logo presence alone.
Throughout the World Cup, sponsors activated through experiences, digital storytelling, player partnerships, products, retail and entertainment. Adidas, for example, combined the match ball, team and player relationships, collaborations and cultural moments to build a presence extending across sport, fashion and lifestyle.
This demonstrates that sponsorship works most effectively as an ecosystem. Each activation should strengthen the next and contribute to one coherent brand story. The result is accumulated impact across different audiences and channels, rather than a collection of isolated appearances.
The shift from rights ownership to cultural participation affects sponsors and non-sponsors alike. Brands without rights must earn a credible role in the conversation. Brands with rights must demonstrate how their presence adds value to the audience experience.
A logo tells people that a brand is there. Communications give them a reason to care.
The halftime show expanded the cultural platform
The first halftime show in FIFA World Cup Final history brought football together with international music, entertainment and social purpose.
Featuring artists including Madonna, BTS, Justin Bieber, Shakira and Burna Boy, the show supported the FIFA Global Citizen Education Fund and expanded the editorial life of the final. It gave entertainment media additional reasons to cover the event and introduced the tournament to the artists’ global communities.
The response, however, was mixed. While the show extended the final’s cultural reach, some fans and commentators questioned whether a Super Bowl-style spectacle belonged within World Cup traditions. The performances lasted 11 minutes, while the complete interval extended to approximately 27 minutes because of the production setup and removal.
The result illustrates an important tension. Cultural expansion can attract new audiences, but reach alone does not guarantee acceptance. Brands and organisers must understand which traditions communities value and introduce new formats in ways that enhance the experience without weakening its established identity.
What brands should take forward
The examples differ in format, scale and investment, but they point to four practical principles:
The 2026 World Cup demonstrated that major sporting events have evolved into broad cultural ecosystems. Official rights can provide powerful access, but participation is what turns that access into relevance.
In the world’s most crowded communications moments, visibility can be purchased. Relevance must be earned.
Share